Free The Rebel Books Online

Itemize About Books The Rebel

Title	:	The Rebel
Author	:	Albert Camus
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	Anniversary Edition
Pages	:	Pages: 320 pages
Published	:	January 1st 1992 by Vintage (first published 1951)
Categories	:	Philosophy. Nonfiction. Writing. Essays. Classics. Cultural. France

The Rebel

Albert Camus

Paperback | Pages: 320 pages

Rating: 4.15 | 11488 Users | 448 Reviews

Narrative To Books The Rebel

By one of the most profoundly influential thinkers of our century, The Rebel is a classic essay on revolution. For Albert Camus, the urge to revolt is one of the "essential dimensions" of human nature, manifested in man's timeless Promethean struggle against the conditions of his existence, as well as the popular uprisings against established orders throughout history. And yet, with an eye toward the French Revolution and its regicides and deicides, he shows how inevitably the course of revolution leads to tyranny, as old regimes throughout the world collapse, The Rebel resonates as an ardent, eloquent, and supremely rational voice of conscience for our tumultuous times.

Translated from the French by Anthony Bower.

List Books Supposing The Rebel

Original Title:	L'homme révolté
ISBN:	0679733841 (ISBN13: 9780679733843)
Edition Language:	English

Rating About Books The Rebel

Ratings: 4.15 From 11488 Users | 448 Reviews

Discuss About Books The Rebel

On page 303 of Albert Camus's windy, long-form essay on the nature of rebellion, the failures of religion, Nihilism and Marxism, he approaches the point: "Man can master in himself everything that should be mastered. He should rectify in creation everything that can be rectified. And after he has done so, children will still die unjustly even in a perfect society. Even by his greatest effort man can only propose to diminish arithmetically the sufferings of the world. But the injustice and the

530. L'Homme révolté = The Rebel, Albert CamusThe Rebel is a 1951 book-length essay by Albert Camus, which treats both the metaphysical and the historical development of rebellion and revolution in societies, especially Western Europe. Camus relates writers and artists as diverse as Epicurus and Lucretius, the Marquis de Sade, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Friedrich Nietzsche, Max Stirner, André Breton, and others in an integrated, historical portrait of man in revolt.

As long as mankind has told stories, the topic of rebellion has been central. Mans disobedience and the loss thereupon of Paradise, as well as Satans rebellion against the oppressive authority of God in Heaven are the two main strands in Miltons classic Paradise Lost, to just name one of countless examples, summing up human experience in unforgettable drama.Camus analyses the topic from a philosophical and historical viewpoint, and gives a perfect example for his thesis on revolution and the

This book has been one of the hardest essays I've ever had to read. I've had to put it down several times. Certainly not because it is not engaging but merely because I had to go look up many of the concepts Camus was referencing. So as a heads up, this is not an easy read but certainly worthwhile. In this legendary essay, he describes rebellion and revolution historically, metaphysically and even through art, rebellion against creation, the human condition, for order, slave against master and

Real generosity towards the future lies in giving all to the present.

Too many young or neophyte readers come to Camus really seeking someone like Herman Hesse. Camus seems exotic and rogue-ish; an outsider; his 'existentialism' (in itself a mistaken label) is so often mistaken for a tacit 'approval' of aloofness, remoteness; iconoclasm; emotional detachment and alieninity. All of these postures appeal strongly to teen readers; adolescents; and intellectual dilettantes. Thus, everyone casually associates Camus with 'The Stranger' and other works of stylish

Interesting book, though I also found it challenging to read. I don't know nearly enough about French literature or philosophy. But the basic question he asks is extremely relevant. We hate injustice, and intuitively it seems clearly right to revolt against unjust authority. So why does it nearly always go so wrong when we do so, and end up with an even worse injustice?